Get to know » Teachers » Self reflection:
Teacher confidence in teaching
Teachers were asked two sets of questions about their confidence in teaching: one set for literacy topics and the other for numeracy topics. The questions were phrased as: ‘How do you find teaching the following aspects of literacy/numeracy?’. Their response options were limited to a four-point scale: ‘Very difficult’, ‘Difficult’, ‘Easy’, and ‘Very easy’.
Confidence in teaching literacy
For reporting purposes, teachers who responded with ‘Easy’ or ‘Very easy’ were considered to demonstrate confidence in teaching a particular topic.
Table TT2.7 shows the percentage of students in Tonga whose teachers expressed confidence in teaching literacy topics.
Overall, most students in both year levels had teachers who were confident in teaching literacy topics. In both year levels, the proportions of students with such teachers ranged from 68% to 96%.
Across both year levels, areas where a lower proportion of students had teachers who expressed confidence were: ‘Quality of ideas’ (year four, 68%; year six, 71%) and ‘Organisation and structure’ (year four, 69%; year six, 74%) in writing. Areas with the highest proportions of students having teachers who expressed confidence were ‘Spelling and punctuation’ (year four, 93%; year six, 84%); ‘Vocabulary (year four, 84%; year six, 84%); and ‘Letter sound correspondence’ (year four, 96%; year six, 83%).
Areas where more students had confident teachers appear to be rules-based subjects or those with more established teaching criteria, such as ‘Spelling and punctuation’ and ‘Vocabulary’. Areas where fewer students had confident teachers appear to be in areas with more subjective, or more complex, teaching and assessment criteria, such as ‘Quality of ideas’ and ‘Organisation and structure’ in writing.
The same questions were asked of teachers in the 2018 PILNA cycle and results from both the 2018 and 2021 cycles of PILNA are presented here for comparison. Table TT2.8 shows the differences in the percentages of students who had a teacher confident in teaching the various literacy areas between 2018 and 2021 PILNA cycles.
Compared with the 2018 PILNA cycle, more students in 2021 had teachers who expressed confidence in teaching literacy across all areas. Every literacy area saw an increase in the proportion of students who had a teacher confident in teaching it. This was true across both year four students and year six students.
Confidence in teaching literacy and teacher qualities
A regional scale focused on measuring teachers’ confidence in teaching literacy based on teachers’ responses was established. Higher scores on this scale indicate higher levels of confidence in teaching literacy. The literacy teaching confidence scores were analysed against teacher demographics (gender, age, teaching experience, and qualification level). The significant findings are listed below.
- Female teachers were more confident in teaching literacy than male teachers.
- Teachers who had a degree level or higher qualification were more confident than teachers who did not.
- Teachers with less experience in teaching (less than 10 years) expressed more confidence in teaching literacy than teachers with more experience (more than 10 years).
Confidence in teaching numeracy
Table TT2.9 below shows the percentage of students whose teachers expressed confidence in teaching numeracy topics.
Most students in both year levels had teachers who were confident in teaching numeracy topics. In both year levels, the proportion of students with confident teachers ranged between 71% and 94%, a similar range to literacy topics.
Across both year levels, the topics where a lower proportion of students had teachers who expressed confidence were ‘Fractions and percentages’ (year four, 77%; year six, 74%) and ‘Measurement’ (year four, 75%; year six, 71%). Topics with the highest proportions of students whose teacher expressed confidence were ‘Place value’ (year four, 94%; year six, 88%) and ‘Numbers and patterns’ (year four, 93%; year six, 88%).
The same questions were asked of teachers in the 2018 PILNA cycle and results from both the 2018 and 2021 cycles of PILNA are presented for comparison. Table TT2.10 shows the differences in the percentages of students who had a teacher confident in teaching the various numeracy areas between 2018 and 2021 PILNA cycles.
Similar findings were found in numeracy as in literacy. In every numeracy area, across both year levels, a higher proportion of students had a teacher confident in teaching the areas in 2021 than in 2018.
Confidence in teaching numeracy and teacher characteristics
A regional scale with nine items focused on measuring teachers’ confidence in teaching numeracy based on teachers’ responses was established. Higher scores on this scale indicate higher levels of confidence in teaching numeracy. As with literacy, the numeracy teaching confidence scores were compared to teachers’ demographic groups (gender, age, teaching experience, highest qualification). There were no gender or teaching experience differences for numeracy teaching confidence, but significant differences were found.
- Teachers who had a degree level or higher qualification were more confident in teaching numeracy than teachers who did not.
- Teachers who were in the older age range (over 35 years old) were more confident in teaching numeracy than teachers in the younger age range (20–35 years old).
What does this mean?
A high proportion of students in Tonga have teachers who are confident in teaching literacy and numeracy. Overall, a lower proportion of students in Tonga have teachers confident in teaching numeracy compared with the regional average.
In literacy, more students have confident teachers in areas that are structured or rule based, such as ‘Punctuation’ and ‘Vocabulary’. Fewer students have confident teachers in areas that require more subjective or complex teaching and assessment, such as ‘Quality of ideas’ and ‘Organisation and structure’ in writing.
Differences were noted within the comparisons for teacher demographic factors and literacy and numeracy teaching confidence. The implications of these associations are unknown.